- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 01:08:53 +0000
- To: www-international@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28263
Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |addison@lab126.com,
| |www-international@w3.org
--- Comment #2 from Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com> ---
(In reply to Philip Jägenstedt from comment #1)
> Yep, this is intentional, and it matches the language for the lang attribute
> in HTML:
> https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#the-lang-and-xml:lang-attributes
Okay, although I generally give a health warning for implementers when it says
the tag must be Valid. The 2119 keyword "must" and the bcp47 keyword "valid"
impose a specific burden that implies, among other things, some sort of failure
mode for well-formed but invalid tags. I suspect that HTML even means
"well-formed"... but I'm perfectly happy with validity checks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 01:08:54 UTC