- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 22:49:23 +0000
- To: www-international@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28740
--- Comment #1 from Jungshik Shin <jshin@chromium.org> ---
Created attachment 1612
--> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1612&action=edit
GB18030-2000 vs GB18030-2005 : PUA =>regular
The attachment lists all the PUA code points for which Simsun (font on
Windows) have glyphs.
The first column is GB18030 byte sequences (2-byte). The second is GB18030-2000
Unicode mapping (PUA) and the third is GB18030-2005 (presumably if glibc's
iconv is correct [1] ) Unicode mapping (non-PUA).
Simsun have glyphs for PUA code points, but it does not cover regular non-PUA
code points (3rd column).
A new Simplfiied Chinese font on Windows (Microsoft Yahei) does cover non-PUA
code points (3rd column) while it does not cover PUA code points (2nd column).
[1] At least for U+FE10 .. U+FE19, it's very likely that it's correct. Those
characters were added to Unicode 4.1 in March 2005 (see
http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/list-unicodeset.jsp?a=\p{subhead=Glyphs%20for%20vertical%20variants}
).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:49:25 UTC