- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:43:22 +0100
- To: www International <www-international@w3.org>
[forwarding to the www-international list] -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Moderator Action] RE: [Encoding] Fixed Unicode statements [I18N-ACTION-337] Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:03:20 +0000 From: Whistler, Ken <ken.whistler@sap.com> To: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>, Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com) <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> CC: www-international@w3.org <www-international@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com>, Whistler, Ken <ken.whistler@sap.com> Addison, I am o.k. with those changes -- although I concur with Asmus' and Martin's further suggestions to tweak the edit a bit. --Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addison@lab126.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:19 PM > To: Whistler, Ken; Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com) > Cc: www-international@w3.org; Philippe Le Hegaret; Mark Davis ☕️ > Subject: [Encoding] Fixed Unicode statements [I18N-ACTION-337] > > Hi Ken and Asmus, > > Recently you helped us address the issue [0] of the Unicode "violation" > statements in the Encoding [1] specification. Based on your > recommendations/suggestions, the document has been changed and no > longer says that it "violates" any Unicode requirements. The editor's copy > that reflects our changes is at [2]. > > The specific quotes still in the document now read: > > [Section 4.2] > -- > This is a much simpler and more restrictive algorithm of mapping labels to > encodings than section 1.4 of Unicode Technical Standard #22 prescribes, as > that is found to be necessary to be compatible with deployed content. > -- > > [Section 14.2] > -- > Checking for and using a byte order mark happens before an encoding to > decode a byte stream is chosen, as seen in the decode algorithm, as is > deemed more accurate than any label. > -- > > The W3C process requires that I get an indication that you are "satisfied" by > our changes. Could you please reply to this email and indicate whether the > changes in the document meet with your approval? > > Regards (for I18N), > > Addison > > [0] http://www.w3.org/International/docs/encoding/encoding- > doc.html#issue-385 > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/encoding/ > [2] http://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 12:43:51 UTC