- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:49:05 +0200
- To: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
- Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > On 8/31/2014 11:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> It does not just apply to user agents. It's also the case for >> developers, specification editors, users, etc. > > Then fix that part - it's the part that I didn't repeat that had the stuff I > thought was more useful in terms of motivating the "irrelevancy". Thanks for being patient with me and sorry for misunderstanding the first time. How about: "Due to implementations sufficiently deviating from the encoding labels listed in the IANA Character Sets registry and the desire to stop legacy encodings from spreading further, this specification is exhaustive about all these details and thereby renders the registry irrelevant." -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 09:49:33 UTC