Re: [Encoding] Status of bug 26154 [I18N-ACTION-338]

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Phillips, Addison <> wrote:
> Can you clarify:
> (1) if you think this item is deferrable for the future/should be deferred
> (2) if not deferred/deferrable, when you might be able to address it

It's something that implementations will align on as soon as IDL
provides support. I don't know when that will be. The API is not
broken without it though.


Received on Sunday, 31 August 2014 17:04:48 UTC