- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:18:12 +0200
- To: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:41 AM, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > Well, one part of the comment is that I'm explicitly asking the WG, because > the WG, and later the W3C as a whole has to be able to stand behind this > specification. Given how even "stable" specifications like XML get drastic changes, can you really trust that? > As with respect to the actual content, I notice that during the time of its > existence, because of the fact that development of Opera >=12 (Presto) got > discontinued, and because, as far as I'm aware, no other browser version > changed their code tables, the amount of compliance actually decreased. Yeah, I would like to study your data. This seems like something we want to address somehow. > Now such a decrease may be just a short-term thing, or it may be not. When > do you think that browser makers such as Microsoft, Google, Mozilla, Apple, > Opera and others will change their implementations? I know Google has made changes for more complex encodings. Mozilla has focused on compliance with regards to labels and encodings exposed to content. I expect that to continue. Probably with Apple and Microsoft dragging behind due to their tight OS integration for this stuff. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 09:18:40 UTC