- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 17:41:38 +0900
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
On 2014/07/02 20:51, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:14 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" > <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: >> I wonder whether the WG has considered the chances of deployment in >> particular for the actual encoding conversion definitions. > > I'm not sure about the WG, but I have. I prefer not to write fictional > standards. It's not clear what the comment here is. Well, one part of the comment is that I'm explicitly asking the WG, because the WG, and later the W3C as a whole has to be able to stand behind this specification. As with respect to the actual content, I notice that during the time of its existence, because of the fact that development of Opera >=12 (Presto) got discontinued, and because, as far as I'm aware, no other browser version changed their code tables, the amount of compliance actually decreased. Now such a decrease may be just a short-term thing, or it may be not. When do you think that browser makers such as Microsoft, Google, Mozilla, Apple, Opera and others will change their implementations? Regards, Martin.
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 08:42:25 UTC