- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:29:56 +0000
- To: Gunnar Bittersmann <gunnar@bittersmann.de>, www-international@w3.org
On 17/03/2014 15:35, Gunnar Bittersmann wrote: > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-choosing-encodings-new > > »» > according to recent<cite></cite> specifications > «« > > Remove empty cite element. Fixed. > > »» > Windows strong page 1361 > «« > > Newly introduced find and replace error. To (mis)quote Spock: > > “I have been – and always shall be – your _code page_ 1361.” ;-) > > > Also in the same paragraph: > »» > This is because they allow ASCII strong points > «« Fixed. > However, I don’t think that the keywords should be marked-up as <strong > class="kw"> > > Stick with code elements, or use span or b. Or for the character > encodings, no markup at all, as before. > > (Don’t replace all occurences of ‘strong’ with ‘code’, there’s a > ‘strongly’ in the text.) The idea was to make them stand out visually. I replaced strong with b. > »» > <a class="termref" href="International/questions/qa-visual-vs-logical"> > «« > > Slash missing in path before ‘International’. Fixed. > > And shouldn’t this link to > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-visual-vs-logical#term_visualordering > given that ‘logically ordered’ links to > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-visual-vs-logical#term_logicalordering > ? No. That's what i wanted. Thanks, RI
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 16:30:25 UTC