W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Two new encoding related articles for review

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:29:56 +0000
Message-ID: <53272304.6010509@w3.org>
To: Gunnar Bittersmann <gunnar@bittersmann.de>, www-international@w3.org
On 17/03/2014 15:35, Gunnar Bittersmann wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-choosing-encodings-new
>
> »»
> according to recent<cite></cite> specifications
> ««
>
> Remove empty cite element.

Fixed.

>
> »»
> Windows strong page 1361
> ««
>
> Newly introduced find and replace error. To (mis)quote Spock:
>
> “I have been – and always shall be – your _code page_ 1361.” ;-)
>
>
> Also in the same paragraph:
> »»
> This is because they allow ASCII strong points
> ««

Fixed.

> However, I don’t think that the keywords should be marked-up as <strong
> class="kw">
>
> Stick with code elements, or use span or b. Or for the character
> encodings, no markup at all, as before.
>
> (Don’t replace all occurences of ‘strong’ with ‘code’, there’s a
> ‘strongly’ in the text.)

The idea was to make them stand out visually. I replaced strong with b.

> »»
> <a class="termref" href="International/questions/qa-visual-vs-logical">
> ««
>
> Slash missing in path before ‘International’.

Fixed.

>
> And shouldn’t this link to
> http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-visual-vs-logical#term_visualordering
> given that ‘logically ordered’ links to
> http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-visual-vs-logical#term_logicalordering
> ?
No. That's what i wanted.

Thanks,
RI
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 16:30:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:36 UTC