- From: Gunnar Bittersmann <gunnar@bittersmann.de>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:35:14 +0100
- To: www-international@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-choosing-encodings-new »» according to recent<cite></cite> specifications «« Remove empty cite element. »» Windows strong page 1361 «« Newly introduced find and replace error. To (mis)quote Spock: “I have been – and always shall be – your _code page_ 1361.” ;-) Also in the same paragraph: »» This is because they allow ASCII strong points «« However, I don’t think that the keywords should be marked-up as <strong class="kw"> Stick with code elements, or use span or b. Or for the character encodings, no markup at all, as before. (Don’t replace all occurences of ‘strong’ with ‘code’, there’s a ‘strongly’ in the text.) »» <a class="termref" href="International/questions/qa-visual-vs-logical"> «« Slash missing in path before ‘International’. And shouldn’t this link to http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-visual-vs-logical#term_visualordering given that ‘logically ordered’ links to http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-visual-vs-logical#term_logicalordering ? Cheers, Gunnar
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 15:35:37 UTC