On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > One thing that's still problematic with the algorithm is that it doesn't > produce a value for 1, because of "if the group is the most significant one > and has the value 1" in step 3. I think we need to say "The following > algorithm converts decimal digits higher than 1 to ethiopic numbers" or > something like it (since testing for the value 1 at the start seems to be > the most efficient approach). > > Nit: in step 5 "exceptgroups with a value of zero" (note the typo) might be > better as "except groups which originally had a value of zero", since the > values have actually been removed by this point (in step 3). Accepted both these corrections. ~TJReceived on Friday, 14 February 2014 18:39:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:41:04 UTC