- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 10:27:50 +0000
- To: www International <www-international@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html
Text version follows:
Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
06 Feb 2014
[2]Agenda
[2]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014Feb/0005.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-irc
Attendees
Present
Richard, Addison, Felix, Mati, JcK
Regrets
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
Addison Phillips
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Agenda
2. [6]Action Items
3. [7]Info Share
4. [8]RADAR
5. [9]Publish: WYNTKA Bidi and Inline Markup ?
6. [10]advice on date/time definitions
7. [11]css syntax @charset
8. [12]Charmod Editing
9. [13]AOB?
* [14]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
Agenda
Action Items
[15]http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
[15] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
close ACTION-279
<trackbot> Closed ACTION-279.
Info Share
richard: working on counter styles
... and tests for that
... implementing Mati's extended Hebrew submission
... getting close to submitting since counter-styles at css
going to PR
... uploading a bunch of CSS tests to their suite
RADAR
[16]https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Review_radar
[16] https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Review_radar
<scribe> ACTION: addison: ask for a LC due date on DOM4
[recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-282 - Ask for a lc due date on dom4
[on Addison Phillips - due 2014-02-13].
Publish: WYNTKA Bidi and Inline Markup ?
<r12a>
[18]http://www.w3.org/International/articles/inline-bidi-markup
/update
[18]
http://www.w3.org/International/articles/inline-bidi-markup/update
richard: been out for review
... had some comments
... addressed them
... want to publish this, replacing the existing one
<scribe> chair: all in favor?
<matial> no pb
richard: would like to change the title
"Inline Markup and Bidi: What you need to know"
<r12a>
[19]http://www.w3.org/International/articlelist#direction
[19] http://www.w3.org/International/articlelist#direction
"Text Direction and Bidi"
matial: Text Direction -> Bidi ?
<matial> +1
<r12a> +1
<fsasaki> +1
+1
<JcK> yes, publish
<scribe> chair: resolved to publish
<r12a> (note that +1s are for proposal to publish)
<scribe> ACTION: richard: publish WYNTK about bidi update,
retitling as appropriate [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-283 - Publish wyntk about bidi
update, retitling as appropriate [on Richard Ishida - due
2014-02-13].
<fsasaki>
[21]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2014
Feb/0006.html
[21]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2014Feb/0006.html
advice on date/time definitions
felix: how would date-time values be referenced
... don't want normative reference to a Note
addison: rfc3339 ?
felix: xliff 2.0 also needs a reference
<fsasaki> addison: reference XML schema date / time type as an
option
<fsasaki> .. in the thread it is not strictly a time stamp
<fsasaki> .. if it is a complete value (date, time, timezone
offset) that is a time stamp
<fsasaki> .. if you want to allow other things that is more
complicated, see e.g. floating number discussion
felix: mainly a timestamp, I think
... but could include things like "should be localized by
such-and-such"
... not sure if that's a timestamp
<fsasaki> addision: could be treated as a time stamp
<fsasaki> .. not necessarily floating
<fsasaki> .. the mail says things like "just having a year
etc." - not sure about the purpose
<fsasaki> .. question is whether you have a specific set of
date values that you want to permit, or just want to allow
definition of some fields with date related information
<fsasaki> [discussion on XML schema data types and whether a
reference to that would help]
<fsasaki> addision: xml schema defines all of the lexical
spaces
<fsasaki> .. the RFC has a list of productions that you can
point to normatively
<fsasaki> .. that does not contain all the complicated stuff
you don't care about
<fsasaki> .. it is an RFC, that has been around for a long time
<scribe> ACTION: felix: write back to XLIFF and ITS-IG with
summary of our discussion [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-284 - Write back to xliff and its-ig
with summary of our discussion [on Felix Sasaki - due
2014-02-13].
css syntax @charset
richard: we can close all of the comments?
<r12a> [23]http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/54
[23] http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/54
addison: there transition document (see email) noted that we
hadn't accept (or not) their rejection of our comments
... satisfied on 306/307
richard: me too
addison: other one is 329
richard: they argued clearly why they don't want to change
... worth raising the issue
... key thing is that it's not really a rule
... wrote a set of tests for syntax
... and submitted those too
... never could do @charset with extra spaces
<scribe> chair: should we accept this?
JcK: would prefer if we fixed it, but not sure worth objecting
<fsasaki> +1
<r12a> accept
<matial> no opinion
<scribe> chair: no formal objection
<scribe> ACTION: addison: respond to ISSUE-329 indicating we
are satisfied with their decision/have no formal objection
[recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-285 - Respond to issue-329 indicating
we are satisfied with their decision/have no formal objection
[on Addison Phillips - due 2014-02-13].
Charmod Editing
[25]http://www.doodle.com/diuzsimytq649rvp
[25] http://www.doodle.com/diuzsimytq649rvp
needs to be refreshed, since it doesn't show times
AOB?
richard: recruiting?
<fsasaki> [26]http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/
[26] http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/
felix: the group is mainly focusing on creating the best
practices
... could contact them about reviews and whether they would
like to join us
richard: good to encourage folks to participate, particularly
member orgs
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: addison: ask for a LC due date on DOM4 [recorded
in [27]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: addison: respond to ISSUE-329 indicating we are
satisfied with their decision/have no formal objection
[recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: felix: write back to XLIFF and ITS-IG with
summary of our discussion [recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: richard: publish WYNTK about bidi update,
retitling as appropriate [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
Received on Friday, 7 February 2014 10:28:20 UTC