On 28 January 2014 10:01, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Andrew Cunningham scripsit:
>
> > PUA is a possibility, although it will have impacts. The PUA in the
> > BMP is heavily used by Microsoft and Apple for legacy data.
>
> As I said before, F000-F0FF is reserved by Microsoft (and also by CSUR)
> for font-kludge encodings such as dingbat fonts: if you put a dingbat
> into a Word document, for example, the internal representation is as a
> character in this range marked up with the respective font.
>
>
Hi John thanks for the correction.
so I assume that browser font fallback behaviour should be different for
F000-F0FF compared to other PUA codepoints.
> --
> There are three kinds of people in the world: John Cowan
> those who can count, cowan@ccil.org
> and those who can't.
>
--
Andrew Cunningham
Project Manager, Research and Development
(Social and Digital Inclusion)
Public Libraries and Community Engagement
State Library of Victoria
328 Swanston Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Australia
Ph: +61-3-8664-7430
Mobile: 0459 806 589
Email: acunningham@slv.vic.gov.au
lang.support@gmail.com
http://www.openroad.net.au/
http://www.mylanguage.gov.au/
http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 05:25:43 UTC