- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:50:50 +0200
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org
Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 16:51:18 UTC
On Jan 27, 2014 5:00 PM, "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > > Henri Sivonen scripsit: > > > (Publishers who use intentionally mis-encoded fonts with @font-face, > > which of course no one should do, > > If their characters are not in (the current portable subset of) Unicode, > then they should. If the characters aren't in Unicode, they should use UTF-8-encoded PUA code points with @font-face. I find it surprising the advising against using the magic x-user-defined label (with means different things depending on context), saying that Latin-1 Supplement shouldn't be commandeered for non-Latin use or saying that PUA shouldn't be used for stuff that has astral mappings is controversial on this list. See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23940 about x-user-defined. You may thank Chrome developers. Apparently it was easier to special-case <meta> than XHR in WebKit.
Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 16:51:18 UTC