Re: [css-fonts-3] i18n-ISSUE-300: ja-jp too verbose

> *:lang(ja-jp) would be better as *:lang(ja) - there is no need for the jp,
> and the general recommendation is to keep the language tag as short as
> possible.

Has this already been updated, or did you mean the other way around
(“*:lang(ja) would be better as *:lang(ja-jp)”)?

(Just a curious bystander though.)

Jens O. Meiert

Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 06:03:32 UTC