- From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:30:45 +0100
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org, 'www-international' <www-international@w3.org>
Hi Richard, Norbert, I just wanted to follow up Yves query on whether the reworking of the ITS2.0 text on LocaleFilter addresses your comments on MLW-LT ISSUE-92 from Richard's original comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0076.html and ISSUE-103 from Norbert's original comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0117.html If we don't hear from you further by the 9th of April we will assume you are satisfied and will proceed to close issue-92 and issue-103. cheers, Dave p.s. Richard, also note we agree with you comment that there should not be normative text in notes, and we have checked that there are no further RFC2119 keyword in any notes in the spec On 23/01/2013 14:54, Yves Savourel wrote: > Hi Richard, Norbert, > > Issue-92: https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/92 > > This issue should be resolved by re-working the text (outside a note). > > > Issue-103: https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/103 > > We would add an explanatory text referring to Extended Filtering. > See the proposal in the Editor's Draft: > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#LocaleFilter > > > Please, let us know if that addresses your comments. > -yves > > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 00:31:16 UTC