RE: I18N comments on TURTLE

Hello Eric,

I have just input the last one. See: http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/34


Thanks,

Addison

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Prud'hommeaux [mailto:ericw3c@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> Prud'hommeaux
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 9:03 AM
> To: Phillips, Addison
> Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org; www-international@w3.org; Gavin
> Carothers
> Subject: Re: I18N comments on TURTLE
> 
> * Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> [2012-09-07 08:17-0700]
> > Dear RDF WG,
> >
> > The Internationalization (I18N) Core WG has recently reviewed your spec [1]
> and has some comments [2][3]. We use the Tracker tool when filing comments,
> and, to keep discussion threads clear, this means that we will be sending
> separate emails, one per comment. This note is to let you know what's going on
> and why we're spamming your list with so many emails :-).
> 
> oof, we've been i18n-wgized!
> 
> Your diligence is much appreciated. I've scanned the comments and note that,
> while Turtle has never been released as a W3C Recommendation, we owe
> some degree of compatibility with both the widely-deployed Turtle data and
> parsers and with teh SPARQL language. The comments which would cnange the
> language, e.g. document-wide language specifiers and \u{xxxxx}, will require
> some consideration.
> 
> Well, I thought I'd scanned them comments, but they appear to still be
> arriving...
> 
> 
> > When responding to a comment, please include the I18N-ISSUE number in the
> subject so that Tracker picks up the response. If your working group has specific
> issues or needs to discuss with I18N, please let me know. We can arrange for
> telechats or joint calls as needed.
> >
> > Best regards (for I18N),
> >
> > Addison
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-turtle-20120710/

> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/08/15-i18n-minutes.html#item06

> > [3] http://www.w3.org/2012/08/22-i18n-minutes.html#item05

> >
> > Addison Phillips
> > Globalization Architect (Lab126)
> > Chair (W3C I18N WG)
> >
> > Internationalization is not a feature.
> > It is an architecture.
> >
> 
> --
> -ericP

Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 16:06:53 UTC