Re: I18N comments on TURTLE

* Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> [2012-09-07 08:17-0700]
> Dear RDF WG,
> 
> The Internationalization (I18N) Core WG has recently reviewed your spec [1] and has some comments [2][3]. We use the Tracker tool when filing comments, and, to keep discussion threads clear, this means that we will be sending separate emails, one per comment. This note is to let you know what's going on and why we're spamming your list with so many emails :-).

oof, we've been i18n-wgized!

Your diligence is much appreciated. I've scanned the comments and note that, while Turtle has never been released as a W3C Recommendation, we owe some degree of compatibility with both the widely-deployed Turtle data and parsers and with teh SPARQL language. The comments which would cnange the language, e.g. document-wide language specifiers and \u{xxxxx}, will require some consideration.

Well, I thought I'd scanned them comments, but they appear to still be arriving...


> When responding to a comment, please include the I18N-ISSUE number in the subject so that Tracker picks up the response. If your working group has specific issues or needs to discuss with I18N, please let me know. We can arrange for telechats or joint calls as needed.
> 
> Best regards (for I18N),
> 
> Addison
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-turtle-20120710/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/08/15-i18n-minutes.html#item06
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2012/08/22-i18n-minutes.html#item05 
> 
> Addison Phillips
> Globalization Architect (Lab126)
> Chair (W3C I18N WG)
> 
> Internationalization is not a feature.
> It is an architecture.
> 

-- 
-ericP

Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 16:03:23 UTC