- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:20:02 +0100
- To: CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com>
- Cc: ishida@w3.org, www-international@w3.org
Hi CE, thanks for your comments on my comments, CE Whitehead, Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:37:11 -0500: > Hi, Leif, R. I., all: >> See http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-char-enc/temp > > From: Leif Halvard Silli > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:09:09 +0100 > >> The document appears thin when it comes to CSS escapes. > >> * The explanation of what an CSS escape is, is now located under the >> heading "What are entities and NCRs?" >> <http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-char-enc/temp#what>. >> I think a separate header for CSS escapes would be better. Or, >> alternatively, that the existing heading should be changed to say "What >> are entities, NCRs and CSS escapes?". > Hmm, entities and NCR's are types of escapes, and the information on > escapes should all be together. > I think the reason that CSS is not singled out is because these > escapes can be in CSS, HTML, or XML, and R. I. does not mention HTML > or XML in the title. Perhaps the title could be > "What are entities and NCRs?: Escapes in HTML, XML, and CSS.: > But you are right, the CSS escapes seem to be a special case. I think that "NCR" is a term that is connected to HTML and XML. This is reflected in R.I.'s text, which says "All NCRs begin with &# and end with ;". This is not how a CSS escape begins and ends. However, even a CSS escape is a kind of numeric character references - so perhaps it can be used about those escapes as well (like you do in your rewording of the heading)? I don't know. I'm in doubt. But I am not against it, if the editor agrees. >> * There should also be a CSS escape example, the same way that there >> already are yellow colored examples of NCR and entities. >> * (One of the) CSS examples could e.g. show what it means in practise >> that the space character terminates the CSS escape, as this can be >> highly confusing for authors. This can best be shown by having a CSS >> selectors which contains only escaped letters, or a selector consisting >> of 3 letters with the escaped one in the middle: > >> .mål{} > >> becomes (note the space) > >> .m\0000e5 l{} > > Thanks; having an example here seems to me a good idea as this is an > area where I am still unsure (whereas I've used entites and NCR's in > HTML a ton). I think you are not alone. >> (3) Specification of the encoding of an external CSS file: The text >> currently says that > >> ]]If your external CSS style sheet contains any non-ASCII text [ >> snip ] you should use the @charset rule as the first thing on the page. >> (It should not be used for CSS embedded in a document.)"[[ > >> However, I think many authors are not aware that they may use HTTP >> to signal the charset of CSS files as well. Therefore I think you >> should mention this. (You already mentioned another alternative in that >> context, namely to use the BOM. BOM has issues of support you say, but >> HTTP work very well, AFAIK.) > > I think R. Ishida did mention this--albeit briefly! See: > http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-char-enc/temp#atcharset (You meant: <http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-char-enc/temp#Slide0400> ) > "For external, linked CSS style sheets the precedence rules are: > > HTTP Content-Type > @charset rule > link charset attribute " Indeed. But unless this is explained, then it kind of hangs in the air. Speaking about using HTTP: Under the heading "What is a HTTP header" (<http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-char-enc/temp#httpheadwhat>), it is adviced to configure Apache to server all HTML pages encoded as UTF8: "AddType 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' html" However, it might also be a good thing to mention that Apache allows us to override [ AKA specify file by file] the encoding very simply by adding charset suffixes, as I explained here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-amaya/2010JanMar/0083.html Authors will, btw, also often find that this works "out of the box". At least it did on my computer. > R. I. hardly discusses the BOM for CSS either; he discusses the > @charset rule > and how it might interact with the BOM (so that if you had a BOM you > might not want an @charset declaration) . . . where does he really, > in-depth, discuss the BOM as a way of declaring the character > encoding for CSS pages? This sounds like a good thing to mention. But does the CSS specifications say that CSS interpreters may in fact use the BOM for detecting the encoding? >> (4) The logics of using escapes in @style and <style> and stylesheets: >> * I believe many web authors think they /have/ to use escapes e.g. in >> CSS selectors. So I think that the document should say that they don't >> have to - they can often type them directly - especially if CSS and >> HTML are located in the same document ... > > Hmm, it might not be explicit enogh; it's certainly implicit; for R. > I. says: > > "It is a good idea to always declare the encoding of external CSS > style sheets if you have any non-ASCII text in your CSS file." Yes. But if a message is important, then it is often good to say it directly. Instead of relying on the reader to put two and two together. >> (5) I believe that many authors are not aware that they may use >> character escapes inside (many) HTML attributes. Hence I think a word >> should be said about that the thing that this is in fact possible. (You >> talk about the style attribute, but @style is - or may appear - as a >> special case. > Perhaps. But there is some mention of this too--it's pretty implicit > in the section: > http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-char-enc/temp#Slide0470 On one side I think that many may consider the style attribute as a special case. On the other side, I don't understand why @style is discussed in particular. (When _I_ read that info, the thing that was new to me was that I could use HTML entities inside the style attribute - where as the point made is that it is better to use CSS escapes.) In HTML4 then there are some attributes which permits entities, and other that don't. E.g. the @id attribute don't. (This is changing in HTML5.) I am probably not the only one that have discovered that NCRs do not validate inside the ID attribute. And so I don't think I am the only one to have been confused about whether I can use character escapes inside attributes. Of course, like many of the other things I have suggested, this suggestion is not without roots in my own experience/confusion. Which might not be universal. ;-) > Do you think additional info about thie use of escapes inside > attributes should be listed in "When to use escapes?" Why not. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 13:20:38 UTC