- From: Najib Tounsi <ntounsi@emi.ac.ma>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:27:49 +0000
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- CC: Andre Schappo <A.Schappo@lboro.ac.uk>, www-international@w3.org
Martin Duerst wrote: > At 23:19 08/11/09, Andre Schappo wrote: > >> I am new to this list so apologies if I initially go over old ground. >> >> I have just been reading <http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-bidi-controls > and have experimented with both unicode and html methods of >> controlling directionality. >> >> What I would really like is a Text Editor that I can toggle between >> "bidi display mode" and "logical display mode" >> >> By "logical display mode" I mean that the editor shows the raw >> underlying characters ie the order they were typed in >> >> By "bidi display mode" I mean displaying the final form after >> application of the direction directives/"character properties". >> >> Anyone know of such a Text Editor ?? I am using Leopard on an Apple Mac. >> >> I have already tried several editors and also gone down to the Unix >> level (pico & vi) but none provide both display modes. >> > > Your "logical display mode" would mean that e.g. Arabic and Hebrew > are written left-to-right, which would simply be unreadable. It depends on what you want to do (and for whom?). Sometime it is easier to fix small portions of bidi-text (e.g. add/delete punctuations) by looking directly at the logical order. There are other use cases. That's why I share Andre Schappo's concern. I remember I once asked if a composer like Mozilla/NVU could offer another mode (in addition to HTML / Wysiwyg modes) to "toggle between 'bidi display mode' and 'logical display mode'", at least in HTML-source mode. The implication of such "logical display mode" is, for Arabic, that the letters shouldn't join (which could contribute to the unreadability you mention). > So that > would be my explanation for why such an editor doesn't exist. > It may be possible to find an editor that essentially does > "logical display" by simply using an editor that doesn't do > any bidi processing. But even editors that don't do any bidi > processing these days may end up with some kind of poor bidi > display, because of the way they use an underlying (OS or > window system) rendering engine. > Yes, that is also an obstacle. Regards, Najib > For a somewhat different approach on how to edit bidi html > and xml, please have a look at > http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp/2005/pub/IUC28-bidi/ and > http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp/2008/pub/IUC32-bidi/. > Comments and questions welcome. > > Regards, Martin. > > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 17:28:02 UTC