- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:33:08 +0900
- To: kuro@sonic.net, www-international@w3.org
At 15:29 08/01/31, KUROSAKA Teruhiko wrote:
>
>
>> I'm wondering if anyone could answer a couple of questions for me. As I understand it Japanese doesn稚 use italics as a form of emphasis, so using |<i>| tags around ideographic text is a big no no. Can anyone
>
>Not necessarily. Use of italic in Japanese text is rare but not wrong.
>
>By the way, the <i> tag will no longer mean italic when the now draft HTML5
>becomes the standard.
I think there is a small but important difference between
"will necessarily be italicized" and "means italic". <i>
always has and still means italic. But since the first days,
without even needing stylesheets, there was no guarantee that
the contents of the <i> element would be rendered in italic,
e.g. on a text-only browser for a 24x80 terminal.
Regards, Martin.
>Here's a quote from:
>http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/#the-i
>---------------------------------------------------
>The i element should be used as a last resort when no other element is more
>appropriate. In particular, citations should use the cite element, defining instances
>of terms should use the dfn element, stress emphasis should use the em element,
>importance should be denoted with the strong element, quotes should be marked
>up with the q element, and small print should use the small element.
>
>Style sheets can be used to format i elements, just like any other element can be
>restyled. Thus, it is not the case that content in i elements will necessarily
>be italicised.
>---------------------------------------------------
>--
>KUROSAKA Teruhiko ("Kuro"), San Francisco, California, USA
>
>
>
>
#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 10:28:20 UTC