- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:33:08 +0900
- To: kuro@sonic.net, www-international@w3.org
At 15:29 08/01/31, KUROSAKA Teruhiko wrote: > > >> I'm wondering if anyone could answer a couple of questions for me. As I understand it Japanese doesn稚 use italics as a form of emphasis, so using |<i>| tags around ideographic text is a big no no. Can anyone > >Not necessarily. Use of italic in Japanese text is rare but not wrong. > >By the way, the <i> tag will no longer mean italic when the now draft HTML5 >becomes the standard. I think there is a small but important difference between "will necessarily be italicized" and "means italic". <i> always has and still means italic. But since the first days, without even needing stylesheets, there was no guarantee that the contents of the <i> element would be rendered in italic, e.g. on a text-only browser for a 24x80 terminal. Regards, Martin. >Here's a quote from: >http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/#the-i >--------------------------------------------------- >The i element should be used as a last resort when no other element is more >appropriate. In particular, citations should use the cite element, defining instances >of terms should use the dfn element, stress emphasis should use the em element, >importance should be denoted with the strong element, quotes should be marked >up with the q element, and small print should use the small element. > >Style sheets can be used to format i elements, just like any other element can be >restyled. Thus, it is not the case that content in i elements will necessarily >be italicised. >--------------------------------------------------- >-- >KUROSAKA Teruhiko ("Kuro"), San Francisco, California, USA > > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 10:28:20 UTC