- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:35:01 +0200
- To: <www-international@w3.org>
Hi Bert, At 20:00 28/08/2007, Bert Bos wrote: >(...) > >B.t.w., section 3.2 of XHTML 1.0 does define the semantics of XHTML >documents when sent as generic XML: they essentially have no semantics. >(Only ID attributes have some meaning, which is normal for anything >that has a DTD.) I don't follow your interpretation: criterion 3 says that only ID attributes shall be recognized *as fragment identifiers*, not that only ID attributes should be recognized *full stop*. As far as I can see, section 3.2 [1] does not make a statement on the semantics of XHTML elements or attributes, with the exception of the ID attribute, attributes that are not recognized and elements that are not recognized. Or am I completely misreading that section? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#uaconf Best regards, Christophe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 18:35:17 UTC