- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:46:35 +0100
- To: "'fantasai'" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "'WWW International'" <www-international@w3.org>
Hi fantasai, Thanks for coming back on that point, which got overlooked during the last rewrite. I have changed the text at http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-bidi-css-markup.en.php#xhtml to clearly reflect the expectation that the HTML semantics are used for XHTML 1.0 served as application/xhtml+xml. I have not mentioned the namespace question, though my inclination is to agree with Bert on that (thanks Bert). RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/ > -----Original Message----- > From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] > Sent: 28 August 2007 15:22 > To: 'WWW International'; 'Richard Ishida' > Subject: FAQ: CSS vs. markup for bidi support > > I was looking at > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-bidi-css-markup > yesterday and noticed that there's still a major error in > this section: > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-bidi-css-markup#xhtml > > Specifically, because namespacing allows XHTML to be > recognized as XHTML even in compound documents, XHTML 'dir' > attributes should work in browsers even when the document is > served as XML. > > I mentioned this in 2005.. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2005JulS ep/0050.html > but it appears it still has not been fixed. :( > > ~fantasai > >
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2007 12:44:26 UTC