fantasai scripsit: > >In both our vertical modes (rl and lr), the baseline is rotated the > >same way, isn't it? So 'left' is always top and 'right' always bottom. > >Maybe it is useful to add that as a note: "(I.e., text is aligned at > >the bottom.)" > > This is true by default, but it may not be true for specific values > of glyph-orientation: rotating glyphs rotates their baseline. > glyph-orientation can make glyphs stand upright in a column, but it > can also turn the line 180deg to face the other way. Just so. For example, Mongolian (strongly top-to-bottom) is rotated clockwise to embed it in Arabic script, but counterclockwise to embed it in Cyrillic or Latin script. Spell it out: "In vertical mode, 'left' means 'top' and 'right' means 'bottom'" (If indeed this is true: is it true of vertical Ogham, which the Unicode Standard (wrongly, in my view) says is strongly bottom-to-top?) > How is 'line-height' biased towards horizontal text? Is not the line-height of vertical text in fact a horizontally measured distance? -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves. --Murray Gell-MannReceived on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 15:36:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:40:53 UTC