- From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:59:49 -0700
- To: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org, "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 19:59:57 UTC
Richard, getting back to the topic of XML, it sounds like we have three cases, illustrated by the following example: <p xml:lang="en">There are three cases: <span>foo</span>, <span xml:lang="">foo</span>, <span xml:lang="und">foo</span> </p> In the first foo construction, we are saying that it inherits the language "en". The second and third construction are equivalent: we are overriding the "en" setting, and saying that foo is undetermined with regard to language. The difference between them is that: - the second construction can't be used in XHTML (or any other case where a DTD or schema requires a value). - the third construction can always be used, but shouldn't be used if the second can be. Mark On 4/11/07, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > > > > > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-no-language > > Comments are being sought on this FAQ-based article prior to final > release. Please send any comments to www-international@w3.org. We expect > to publish a final version in one to two weeks. > > > > ============ > Richard Ishida > Internationalization Lead > W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) > > http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ > http://www.w3.org/International/ > http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/ > > > > -- Mark
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 19:59:57 UTC