- From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:30:39 -0700
- To: "John Cowan" <cowan@ccil.org>
- Cc: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>, www-international@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 19:30:43 UTC
We do not interpret "und" as meaning that anything is known about the contents, it is simply undetermined or unknown. Where do you get the interpretation that "und" must be linguistic? Mark On 4/11/07, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote: > > > Richard Ishida scripsit: > > > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-no-language > > > > Comments are being sought on this FAQ-based article prior to final > > release. Please send any comments to www-international@w3.org. We > > expect to publish a final version in one to two weeks. > > The claim that "und" and "" mean the same thing is wrong, and I apologize > for spreading misinformation on this point. "" is the same as no language > declaration at all, so it is ambiguous between "zxx" (non-linguistic) > and "und" (linguistic). The only time it makes sense to use it is when > you have a language declaration for a document or section thereof and wish > to turn it off for some subsection. > > -- > They tried to pierce your heart John Cowan > with a Morgul-knife that remains in the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > wound. If they had succeeded, you would > become a wraith under the domination of the Dark Lord. --Gandalf > > -- Mark
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 19:30:43 UTC