RE: Java I18N

Karen_Broome wrote:

This raises an interesting point.  Unlike Braille, the script is not
encoded and likely won't be as this script doesn't lend itself well to
digital representation, 

Why? It seems to lends itself as much (or as little) to digital
representation as Braille does. Indeed, I would suggest using private
use code points in Unicode to represent the Moon characters (until they
are encoded). If someone makes a proposal document, I don't see any a
priori reason for not encoding Moon characters.
 
        /kent k
 

Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 07:06:35 UTC