- From: McDonald, Ira <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:38:04 -0800
- To: "'Chris Lilley'" <chris@w3.org>, David Clarke <w3c@dragonthoughts.co.uk>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org
Hi, Thanks to Chris for a good chuckle. My wife suggests why not just retreat to Cuneiform and stop using these upstart scripts entirely? (smile) Cheers, - Ira Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Blue Roof Music / High North Inc PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 phone: +1-906-494-2434 email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com -----Original Message----- From: www-international-request@w3.org [mailto:www-international-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Chris Lilley Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:31 AM To: David Clarke Cc: www-international@w3.org Subject: Re: IDN problem.... :( On Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 4:06:29 PM, David wrote: DC> One possible solution for the IDN is to determine "similar" looking DC> characters, such as I (U+ 0049: Latin Capital Letter L) and l (U+006C: DC> Latin Small Letter L) (which look visually identical in Arial Unicode DC> MS) and limit new registration of only one of the code points. Excellent idea! This ASCII stuff has some very similar looking characters, they should never have been allowed. "L' and "1", "O" and "0". Typewriters had just one key for these characters, it was good enough then ... Personally I feel that the Latin and Cyrillic alphabets have not proved their worth and we should go back to using Greek and Etruscan scripts. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 16:39:38 UTC