- From: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:13:40 -0500
- To: Mark Davis <mark.davis@jtcsv.com>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org
Mark Davis scripsit:
> a.. We recommend the use of XHTML wherever possible; and if you serve XHTML as
> text/html we assume that you are conforming to the compatibility guidelines in
> Appendix C of the XHTML 1.0 specification.
>
> a.. We recognize that XHTML served as XML is still not widely supported, and
> that therefore many XHTML 1.0 pages will be served as text/html.
>
> Isn't this a pretty counter-productive recommendation; it sounds like you are
> saying: "we recommend that you use something that won't work on the vast
> majority of your users browsers"?
No. What it says is: a) use XHTML for authoring; b) use the compatibility
recommendations; c) label it as text/html.
--
As you read this, I don't want you to feel John Cowan
sorry for me, because, I believe everyone jcowan@reutershealth.com
will die someday. http://www.reutershealth.com
--From a Nigerian-type scam spam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2004 12:54:18 UTC