- From: LUNDER,BEN (HP-Australia,ex3) <ben.lunder@hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 03:43:21 -0400
- To: www-international@w3.org
- Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20030518034125.07628f20@localhost>
Thank you for your explanations. The reason I am posing these questions is because I am looking to provide architectural simplification for multi-lingual customer facing web applications. Using UTF-8 from end to end does simplify some aspects of the application architecture. My findings so far indicate that internal or partner facing applications have a reasonable uptake of UTF-8 from end to end. Perhaps this is due to the control that is available over OS and browser versions within a smaller audience of application users. On the other hand, where there is less control over the general public's device, operating system, browser version and general sentiment, most organisations are playing it safe and sticking to the legacy encoding schemes. I would imagine that the wins associated to the simplification of multi-lingual web application architectures may be considered over the next few years, and consequently encourage the use of UTF-8 from end to end. Obviously google, being the market leader they are, is one of those organisations looking for and applying these simplifications. Kind regards, Benjamin Lunder Hewlett-Packard
Attachments
- application/vnd.ms-powerpoint attachment: end2end.ppt
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2003 03:43:39 UTC