- From: Yung-Fong Tang <ftang@netscape.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 11:48:14 -0800
- To: "Carl W. Brown" <cbrown@xnetinc.com>
- CC: www-international@w3.org
Netscape 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 all support ISO-8859-15 . Not Netscape 4.x "Carl W. Brown" wrote: > Tex, > > I wonder why no one seems to care about the Euro? Are sites going to > continue to use iso-5589-1? How many browsers and systems support > iso-5589-15? > > Carl > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-international-request@w3.org > > [mailto:www-international-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Tex Texin > > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 7:42 PM > > To: Martin Duerst > > Cc: David_Possin@i2.com; Karl Ove Hufthammer; www-international@w3.org > > Subject: Re: valid locales ---> was Re: bilingual websites > > > > > > Martin, > > > > You mean I can't just grouse and take potshots from the sidelines? ;-) > > > > Well, I have not seen an alternative proposed and I don't have one at > > the ready, but I don't mind taking a shot at improving the current > > situation. However, I am crunching now thru the end of the year, so I > > will give it a go in the new year. > > In the meantime, I would be happy to collect both suggestions for > > requirements and suggestions for solutions on this list or privately. > > > > The new year should be interesting, as the switch to the new Euro > > currency will demonstrate some of the chaos with locales. > > > > tex > > > > Martin Duerst wrote: > > > > > > Tex - Could you write up (short), or point to, any proposal > > > for how to do better than currently? > > > > > > Regards, Martin. > > > > > > At 14:57 01/10/31 -0500, Tex Texin wrote: > > > >David, > > > > > > > >FWIW, I thoroughly agree that locales as we currently define and > > > >implement them, do not work. > > > >As a naming convention it is inadequate, and when you select a > > name, you > > > >are not sure what behavior you will get. > > > > > > > >I have mentioned this before, and the response is always "Yes, it's > > > >broken, but it is the best we have at the moment.". > > > > > > > >It is rather unfortunate that we have this methodology therefore, and > > > >that it is accepted, since it won't be fixed as long as this response > > > >continues. > > > > > > > >tex > > > > > > > >-- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >Tex Texin Director, International Business > > > >mailto:Texin@Progress.com Tel: +1-781-280-4271 > > > >the Progress Company Fax: +1-781-280-4655 > > > >------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Tex Texin Director, International Business > > mailto:Texin@Progress.com Tel: +1-781-280-4271 > > the Progress Company Fax: +1-781-280-4655 > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 14:52:03 UTC