- From: Karl Ove Hufthammer <huftis@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 11:54:02 +0100
- To: <www-international@w3.org>, "Shailendra Musale \(by way of \"Martin J. Duerst\" <duerst@w3.org>\)" <shailendra.musale@f-secure.com>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shailendra Musale (by way of "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>)" <shailendra.musale@f-secure.com> To: <www-international@w3.org> Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 1:58 AM Subject: 3-Letter Language Code > 1) Is there any International-Standard > List of 3-letter language codes - codes which > can be used for all popular operating systems? Yes, ISO 639-2, which you can find at <URL: http://lcweb.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/ >. > 2) If we choose to use Microsoft-provided (or Windows-specific) > 3-letter language codes and later if we come-up with UNIX-version > of the software, then for UNIX platform, we have to modify some of the > existing > language codes, right? will there be any problems due to > conflicts in language-codes? I think the language codes Microsoft uses are ISO 639-2, so this is not a problem. What may be a problem is that other platforms use ISO 639-1, *two-letter* languages codes (I thought Windows used this too). > 3) Which codes should we use for Simplified Chinese > and Traditional Chinese? > Is it CHS and CHT respectively? > or CHN and TWN respectively? I think you should use 'chi' for both (though I'm not 100% sure). Simplified and Traditional Chinese are the same *language*. -- Karl Ove Hufthammer
Received on Monday, 25 December 2000 05:54:19 UTC