- From: Chris Pratley <chrispr@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:08:00 -0800
- To: "'Chris Lilley'" <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: "'olin@worldpoint.com'" <olin@worldpoint.com>, "Guo, Xin" <Xin.Guo@usa.xerox.com>, www-international@w3.org, info@unicode.org
Chris, if you care about your presentation working in Navigator (remember many corporate clients don't), you can switch the output in PowerPoint to a lower quality representation that Navigator can handle. Here are the steps: In PowerPoint, File/Save as Web Page Click "Publish..." In the "Browser Support" area, select the browser level you want: * IE4 and higher (high fidelity) * IE and Nav 3 or higher * All browsers listed above (creates larger files) Click "Publish". The default is IE4 and higher only because many of the animations and special PowerPoint features couldn't be supported even under Navigator 4.x. The PowerPoint team tried pretty hard to support Navigator due to the large installed base, but ultimately they didn't want to sacrifice the quality of the resulting HTML presentation. Supporting both high and low fidelity resulted in files too large for the typical corporate user (our target), so they went with IE only. It was a hard decision, and you can accept that explanation or not but that is what happened. Remember our two main goals were WYSIWYG and full roundtrip capability, with files that were not excessively large provided the first two goals were met. Let me know if you try this option out and tell me what you think. As for the XML - I'll look into what happened there. Our intent was definitely to do correct XML syntax. Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word -----Original Message----- From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 12:47 AM To: Chris Pratley Cc: 'olin@worldpoint.com'; Guo, Xin; www-international@w3.org; info@unicode.org Subject: Re: Unicode compliant HTML editor? Chris Pratley wrote: > > I would suggest the Office2000 family over Office97. The HTML support is > vastly improved and built in to all the products. I guess that depends on your definition of improved. While there are certainly improvements, I am not happy with a product that automatically inserts a check for Netscape and redirects to an error page if I am not using IE. (PowerPoint 2000). Its also very disappointing that the output looks like it might be XML (xml namespace declarations, etc) but in fact is not (for example, missing quotes in attribute values). > HTML in UTF-8, UCS-2 > (little endian and big endian) are possible. > > Notepad that supports UTF-8 is only on Windows2000. Ooh, I will look out for that one. I am running Win2k. > From: Olin Lagon [mailto:olin@worldpoint.com] >> The Office 97 version of Microsoft Word (Word 97) will allow files to be >> saved as UTF-8 and in HTML format. Yes. Then use Dave Ragetts "tidy" program which is optimised for taking Office 97 files and turning them into HTML. Its Unicode-freindly as long as you use UTF-8. It also has increasing support for dealing with Word2000 files as well. It runs on a bunch of different platforms. http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/ -- Chris
Received on Friday, 21 January 2000 16:01:32 UTC