- From: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 12:37:52 -0700
- To: "Tim Chen" <timchen@u.washington.edu>, <www-international@w3.org>, <www-html@w3.org>
Tim Chen wrote: >I vote for yyyy-mm-dd format. Actually, year should not be confined to 4 digits -- t'would be sorely regretted come the year 10000. In deference to different calendars and pre-creational references, would it not be wise to suffix the type and allow negative years? E.g. -2004-02-03-christian David Perrell
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 1997 15:39:30 UTC