- From: Carrasco Benitez Manuel <manuel.carrasco@emea.eudra.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 11:19:17 +0100
- To: "'Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no'" <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
- Cc: "'www-international@w3.org'" <www-international@w3.org>, "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>, "'unicode@unicode.org'" <unicode@unicode.org>, "'Patrice.HUSSON@bxl.dg13.cec.be'" <Patrice.HUSSON@bxl.dg13.cec.be>
> I will, however, continue to object to your statement that the > euro *glyph* is important to Europeans. > [Carrasco Benitez Manuel] > This is not the case. The glyph on *itself* is very important > to the European Union: this is official and it has been stated > by the European Commission. For the official position have > a look at: > > http://europan.eu.int/euro/ > > Regards > Tomas >
Received on Thursday, 16 October 1997 06:19:50 UTC