- From: M.T. Carrasco Benitez <carrasco@innet.lu>
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 11:48:59 +0100 (MET)
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- cc: www-international@w3.org
> What I meant to say (besides quoting Lee's example) is that > such examples convince me that trying to be objective about > Content-Language isn't really useful or realistic. There > are so many odd special cases that you can't write enough > explicit rules to cover all of the cases. Content-Language is useful and realistic and the only explicit rule needed is: "The doc contain texts in the languages expressed in this field." The percentage is secondary. The author of the doc decides which are the languages in the Content-Language. If the author wants to mislead the reader, it is his business. Tomas
Received on Sunday, 9 March 1997 06:00:33 UTC