- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 15:33:14 PST
- To: wjs@netscape.com
- CC: Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr, mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch, www-international@w3.org, Alan_Barrett/DUB/Lotus.LOTUSINT@crd.lotus.com, bobj@netscape.com, erik@netscape.com, Ed_Batutis/CAM/Lotus@crd.lotus.com
with regard to "accept-charset:", I was wrong: Jim Saunders wrote: # But I thought that using the "*" was not legal in HTTP/1.1? We asked # this very question no. It is exactly what we would like to use. You're right. I was thinking of 'accept'. It doesn't seem like "*" is legal in HTTP/1.1 in "accept-charset:". So you're stuck using accept-charset: utf-8,iso-8859-5 for your preferred encodings, or just leaving the whole thing out and taking what the sender sends you. Maybe that's not so bad? Larry
Received on Thursday, 5 December 1996 19:58:06 UTC