- From: Chris Wendt <christw@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 16:53:48 -0800
- To: "'garym@softshore.com.au'" <garym@softshore.com.au>, "'www-international@w3.org'" <www-international@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Alan Barrett/DUB/Lotus'" <Alan_Barrett/DUB/Lotus.LOTUSINT@crd.lotus.com>
Re overhead quantification: A "good" browser would need to send all or most of the charsets listed in ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets Easy to take all the names, concatenate them and measure the size. I didn't do it but instead looked at the size of the IANA document itself which is 44282 bytes. Assuming the text contains 2/3 overhead, the accept-charset string would be 14 KB, attached to every GET. Not counting that the server would need to sort through them and find a match with a server-side available document or conversion mechanism. >-----Original Message----- >From: garym@softshore.com.au [SMTP:garym@softshore.com.au] >Sent: Thursday, December 05, 1996 3:33 PM >To: www-international@w3.org >Cc: Alan Barrett/DUB/Lotus >Subject: Re: Accept-Charset support > >On 4 Dec 96 16:00:13 EST, Alan Barrett wrote: > >>I would like to get agreement on a definite proposal of how WWW browser >>vendors >>should request a server to send UTF-8. >> >>Browser vendors are not keen to send a very long list of character sets >>accepted due to the overhead. So I propose that the browser vendors pick one >>of >>the following... >>... > >Could somebody please quantify this extra overhead? > > > >-- g. >
Received on Thursday, 5 December 1996 19:53:20 UTC