- From: Gunnar Bittersmann <gunnar@bittersmann.de>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:14:03 +0200
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
Hi Richard,
While referencing to
http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags in my talk at
Front-Trends in Warsaw, I found that the quotes from the HTML5 spec in
section ‘What they're for’
http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags#whatfor are
outdated, “whose typical typographic presentation is…” has been removed
long time ago.
The section should read now:
The HTML5 specification redefines the intended use of these elements as
follows.
"The i element represents a span of text in an alternate voice or
mood, or otherwise offset from the normal prose in a manner indicating a
different quality of text, such as a taxonomic designation, a technical
term, an idiomatic phrase from another language, transliteration, a
thought, or a ship name in Western texts."
"The b element represents a span of text to which attention is
being drawn for utilitarian purposes without conveying any extra
importance and with no implication of an alternate voice or mood, such
as key words in a document abstract, product names in a review,
actionable words in interactive text-driven software, or an article lede."
Under ‘Recommended usage’
http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags#recommendations,
it says “4.6 Text-level semantics”, but this section is 4.5 now. The
link has become wrong also, it is
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#text-level-semantics
now (if you want to point to HTML 5.1 Nightly which is totally fine).
But that section does not have a menu, there is little use to point the
reader there. The menu is at the top of the page. So the link might go
to http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html and be
titled “4 The elements of HTML”. But then the sentence doesn’t make
sence anymore. Maybe something like “In the HTML5 specification _4 The
elements of HTML_ lists in section 4.5 Text-level semantics other
elements…”?
Also, the links in the ‘Further reading‘ section
http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags#endlinks need
to be changed as well. Their numbers are “4.5.22 The i element” and
“4.5.23 The b element” and they should point to
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#the-i-element and
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#the-b-element respectively.
Aren‘t you removing those links from the ‘Further reading‘ section now
and put them into the article text? This would mean to have the links to
the spec right in the before mentioned section ‘What they're for’ (“The
HTML5 specification redefines…”)
Cheers,
Gunnar
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2015 05:14:29 UTC