- From: Gunnar Bittersmann <gunnar@bittersmann.de>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:14:03 +0200
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
Hi Richard, While referencing to http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags in my talk at Front-Trends in Warsaw, I found that the quotes from the HTML5 spec in section ‘What they're for’ http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags#whatfor are outdated, “whose typical typographic presentation is…” has been removed long time ago. The section should read now: The HTML5 specification redefines the intended use of these elements as follows. "The i element represents a span of text in an alternate voice or mood, or otherwise offset from the normal prose in a manner indicating a different quality of text, such as a taxonomic designation, a technical term, an idiomatic phrase from another language, transliteration, a thought, or a ship name in Western texts." "The b element represents a span of text to which attention is being drawn for utilitarian purposes without conveying any extra importance and with no implication of an alternate voice or mood, such as key words in a document abstract, product names in a review, actionable words in interactive text-driven software, or an article lede." Under ‘Recommended usage’ http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags#recommendations, it says “4.6 Text-level semantics”, but this section is 4.5 now. The link has become wrong also, it is http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#text-level-semantics now (if you want to point to HTML 5.1 Nightly which is totally fine). But that section does not have a menu, there is little use to point the reader there. The menu is at the top of the page. So the link might go to http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html and be titled “4 The elements of HTML”. But then the sentence doesn’t make sence anymore. Maybe something like “In the HTML5 specification _4 The elements of HTML_ lists in section 4.5 Text-level semantics other elements…”? Also, the links in the ‘Further reading‘ section http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-b-and-i-tags#endlinks need to be changed as well. Their numbers are “4.5.22 The i element” and “4.5.23 The b element” and they should point to http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#the-i-element and http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#the-b-element respectively. Aren‘t you removing those links from the ‘Further reading‘ section now and put them into the article text? This would mean to have the links to the spec right in the before mentioned section ‘What they're for’ (“The HTML5 specification redefines…”) Cheers, Gunnar
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2015 05:14:29 UTC