- From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:30:48 +0000
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
This is probably similar to my earlier confusion about mono-ruby with more than three ruby characters [1]. The second paragraph of Section 3.3.7, "Positioning of Jukugo-ruby with Respect to Base Characters", begins: If there is any kanji character in a given kanji compound word which needs more than three ruby characters, the jukugo-ruby layout cannot be used. However, the alternative methods in Fig. 130 and Fig. 131 are both described as jukugo-ruby and both show three or fewer ruby characters per kanji. 1. Should "jukugo-ruby" in the first sentence be "mono-ruby"? 2. It's not clear to me whether the examples in Fig. 131 are correct for both nakatsuki-ruby and katatsuki-ruby or whether only katatsuki-ruby is being illustrated in this figure. 3. Who or what decides whether the maximum overhang over another base character is either a full character width or one and a half times the full-width of a ruby character? Regards, Tony Graham Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert Menteith Consulting Ltd XML Guild member XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2009Jul/0002.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-jlreq-20090604/#en-subheading2_3_7
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 17:31:23 UTC