- From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:07:05 +0000
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
"adjacent" appears to be used in two senses when describing ruby. Section 3.3.5 contains: For mono-ruby, base characters and adjacent ruby characters are handled as one object Section 3.3.6 contains: inter-character space between each adjacent ruby character inter-character space between each adjacent ruby characters inter-character space between each adjacent base character (x2) For group-ruby, base characters and adjacent ruby characters are handled as one object, and internal line-breaks are prohibited. Also, for an object constructed with base characters and adjacent ruby characters it is prohibited to insert additional spaces between each character for line adjustment. Section 3.3.7 contains: type of script of the adjacent characters Section 3.3.8 contains: spacing between base characters and their adjacent characters in the main text It seems to me that sequential characters are being described as adjacent and that base and ruby characters are also being described as adjacent. Would it be better to use a different word for one of these two cases? Regards, Tony Graham Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert Menteith Consulting Ltd XML Guild member XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 17:07:48 UTC