Re: LTLI draft: changes

Looks good. By chance, I was just making draft changes to LDML in response
to a bug to update to RFC3066bis (we thought we'd have a final number by
now, but no such luck!). I have draft language at

http://dev.icu-project.org/cgi-bin/cldr/locale-bugs-private/data#replies

Any feedback is welcome; the committee will be looking at this on Tuesday
morning.

Mark

On 5/13/06, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry, this took longer than expected ... please have a look at the
> editor's copy at http://www.w3.org/International/core/langtags/ .
>
> I implemented the discussion at www-i18n-comments until
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006May/0006.html
> changes are in sec. 1.4, see
> http://www.w3.org/2006/05/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action11
>
> I also implemented  the proposal from Francois / Richard to have
> examples for the terms used, see
> http://www.w3.org/2006/05/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action12
> changes are in sec. 2.1 (a new example).
>
> The last change: I added a revision log, see App. C.
>
> Please give feedback until next week Wednesday morning (European time, I
> will be on travel). If nobody disagrees until Wednesday, I will request
> republication of the draft.
>
> We have not yet addressed all proposals from Addison on new / different
> conformance criteria, see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006May/0000.html
> (search for "General: I really think "), or wrote something for sec. 5
> "Guidelines for the Interoperable Implementation of this Specification"
> . I would propose to discuss these issues after republication of the
> draft, since
> a) I expect the discussion to take some time
> b) we made a lot of changes in the last weeks, which we should bring to
> the public rather sooner than later. Note that
> http://www.w3.org/International/core/langtags/ is quite different from
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ltli-20060419/ ...
>
> Regards, Felix.
>
>
>