- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:24:16 +0100
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
Dear Internationalization Working Group, It seems that the latest versions of http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/ and http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-resid/ have been published in violation with the current operative W3C Process document. The Process document requires that all comments have been addressed by the Working Group, but for example http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2004Apr/0020.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2003Aug/0000.html have not been addressed at all. This also applies to some follow-up comments such as http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2004Oct/0048.html which has not been addressed either. I further note that the removal of the entire section 7 of the Charmod LC document clearly invalidates my review of the document as I've indicated in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Apr/0007.html and the removal is thus a substantive change which requires that the document is returned to the Working Group for further work (which would require publication of another LC WD to proceed). It further seems that this change is not properly documented, the changes document states something to this effect, but the note is marked up with <del> implying that the LC document had this note but it did not. Last but not least it seems that some promised edits have not actually been made, e.g. in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2004Oct/0040.html I've been told that the prose text for C076 will be changed to discuss something but character encodings but it still mentions "iso-8859-1" which still does not make sense to me. There is little that can be done about some of these issues (and there are actually more but they are of less concern to me), but I want my comments formally addressed by the Working Group and I thus hereby re- submit all unaddressed comments (including but not limited to those I've mentioned, I can't check them all right now). regards.
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 09:24:48 UTC