- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:40:39 +0900
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
- Cc: connolly@w3.org (Dan Connolly)
This is a last call comment from Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org) on the Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/). Semi-structured version of the comment: Submitted by: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org) Submitted on behalf of (maybe empty): Comment type: substantive Chapter/section the comment applies to: 4.6 Character Escaping The comment will be visible to: public Comment title: appropriate mechanism exists... says who? Comment: Regarding... C042 [S] Specifications MUST NOT invent a new escaping mechanism if an appropriate one already exists. How is this to be tested/measured/observed? How is existence of an appropriate mechanism to be determined? I don't see how making that a conformance clause helps. At least change it to SHOULD NOT. Structured version of the comment: <lc-comment visibility="public" status="pending" decision="pending" impact="substantive" id="LC-"> <originator email="connolly@w3.org" >Dan Connolly</originator> <represents email="" >-</represents> <charmod-section href='http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-charmod-20040225/#sec-Escaping' >4.6</charmod-section> <title>appropriate mechanism exists... says who?</title> <description> <comment> <dated-link date="2004-03-18" href="http://www.w3.org/mid/325277583.20040318234039@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp" >appropriate mechanism exists... says who?</dated-link> <para>Regarding... C042 [S] Specifications MUST NOT invent a new escaping mechanism if an appropriate one already exists. How is this to be tested/measured/observed? How is existence of an appropriate mechanism to be determined? I don't see how making that a conformance clause helps. At least change it to SHOULD NOT.</para> </comment> </description> </lc-comment>
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 18:40:41 UTC