- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:01:25 +0900
- To: "Matitiahu Allouche" <matial@il.ibm.com>, www-i18n-comments@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, ietf-bidi@imc.org, bidi@unicode.org
Hello Mati, Many thanks for your comments on the bidi section of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-01.txt. I have implemented this in my editing version. I think the reason for the original wording was that we wanted to be on the safe side. I also note that we seem to now be very close to section 6 of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-stringprep-04.txt. Regards, Martin. At 12:26 02/07/12 +0300, Matitiahu Allouche wrote: >Section 4.1 list 3 restrictions for components in a Bidi IRI. The third >restriction says: > > 3) A component using right-to-left characters MUST NOT use any > > other class of characters (e.g. neutrals or numbers). > >This seems to me much too restrictive without a corresponding benefit. I >suggest the following change: > 3) A component using right-to-left characters MUST start and end >with right-to-left characters. Other class of characters (e.g. neutrals >or numbers) may be used in >between. > >Explanation: the mixing of right-to-left and left-to-right characters >within a component is already disallowed by restriction #1. So the only >other classes of graphic characters remaining are numbers and neutrals. As >long as they do not appear at an extremity, they do not create ambiguity >or "blending" of the display of logically disconnected parts. Unless >someone can provide examples of bad cases which are avoided by the >original restriction #3 but are allowed by my proposed version, I suggest >to release the restriction according to my proposal. > >Shalom (Regards), Mati > Bidi Architect > Globalization Center Of Competency - Bidirectional Scripts > IBM Israel > Phone: +972 2 5870999 ext. 1202 Fax: +972 2 5870333 Mobile: >+972 52 554160
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2002 04:01:34 UTC