- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:18 +0900
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
- Cc: cmsmcq@acm.org (C. M. Sperberg-McQueen)
This is a last call comment from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (cmsmcq@acm.org) on the Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/). Semi-structured version of the comment: Submitted by: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (cmsmcq@acm.org) Submitted on behalf of (maybe empty): Comment type: substantive Chapter/section the comment applies to: 3.6 Choice and Identification of Character Encodings The comment will be visible to: public Comment title: Heuristics Comment: The spec says "[S] Specifications MUST NOT propose the use of heuristics to determine the encoding of data." Is it your intent to outlaw the heuristics given by the XML 1.0 spec? If not, I believe the wording of this requirement is incorrect, and should be changed to something specifying that heuristics should be used only in the absence of usable labels. If it is your intent to disallow the heuristics defined in XML 1.0, I disagree, and believe the MUST NOT should be changed to something weaker, preferably a generic health warning. Structured version of the comment: <lc-comment visibility="public" status="pending" decision="pending" impact="substantive"> <originator email="cmsmcq@acm.org" represents="-" >C. M. Sperberg-McQueen</originator> <charmod-section href='http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/#sec-Encodings' >3.6</charmod-section> <title>Heuristics</title> <description> <comment> <dated-link date="2002-07-12" >Heuristics</dated-link> <para>The spec says "[S] Specifications MUST NOT propose the use of heuristics to determine the encoding of data." Is it your intent to outlaw the heuristics given by the XML 1.0 spec? If not, I believe the wording of this requirement is incorrect, and should be changed to something specifying that heuristics should be used only in the absence of usable labels. If it is your intent to disallow the heuristics defined in XML 1.0, I disagree, and believe the MUST NOT should be changed to something weaker, preferably a generic health warning. </para> </comment> </description> </lc-comment>
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 22:18:38 UTC