- From: Stephen Stewart <carisenda@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:17:05 +0000
- To: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
On 26 Mar 2009, at 17:08, Philip & Le Khanh wrote: > Well, not "preposterous", but possibly oxymoronic. > Thufir, John's point (if it is unclear) is that there > is no such concept as "sufficiently valid"; either > a document is valid, or it is not : there are no > in-between states (/tertium non datur/). Of course, > there are certain projects currently underway that > seek to re-define "valid", but that is another matter > entirely ... > > Philip TAYLOR > -------- If he didn't regret his mistake in emailing this list before, he probably does now. -- Stephen
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 17:17:48 UTC