- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:13:56 +0900
- To: Luca Passani <passani@eunet.no>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20080623191355.GC17204@sideshowbarker>
Hi Luca, > @2008-06-23 20:14 +0200: > Michael(tm) Smith wrote: >>> any other comments on why the "style" attribute would be deprecated? >> I honestly don't remember the history on that. I was not involved >> directly in work on the XHTML Basic spec. But I'd speculate that >> it was due to the desire to separate out all presentational markup >> and to require authors and content provides to a separate external >> or embedded CSS stylesheet instead of inline styles. > sure, but this is the kind of things that makes one wonder whether those > who create the W3C recommendations have ever been involved in a real > project and have faced the challenges developers find in real life (such > as not being able to separate style and content as neatly as the W3C > heads assume to be possible). In fact, I would argue that it's not even > possible to define what is style and what is content on a general basis. > > Where do I apply for requesting "undeprecation" of the style attribute. The "Status of this Document" section for all published W3C Working Draft, Candidate/Proposed Recommendations always lists the address of a mailing list to which comments should be sent. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/#status In the case of XHTML Basic 1.0, it seems it's www-html-editor@w3.org In notice that the SOTD for XHTML Basic 1.0 also says that the deadline for sending such comments July 15. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 19:14:33 UTC