www-html@w3.org from December 2008 by date

Wednesday, 31 December 2008

• Schemas for XHTMLT Modularization 1.1 Robert C. Leif

Thursday, 18 December 2008

• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Info
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Ian Hickson
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Patrick H. Lauke

Wednesday, 17 December 2008

• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Jim Jewett
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Ian Hickson
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Jim Jewett
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis David Woolley
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Ian Hickson
• 2nd World Summit on the KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY: Ten ISI-SCI//SSCI+Springer Proceedings +55special issues in International Journals Miltiadis D. Lytras

Tuesday, 9 December 2008

• Re: abbr vs alt Sorin Schwimmer

Monday, 8 December 2008

• Re: abbr vs alt Simon Pieters

Sunday, 7 December 2008

• Re: Replaceable element for parameterising pages (was: Proposal for small enhancement) Sorin Schwimmer
• abbr vs alt Jim Jewett

Friday, 5 December 2008

• Re: Replaceable element for parameterising pages (was: Proposal for small enhancement) Sorin Schwimmer
• Re: Replaceable element for parameterising pages (was: Proposal for small enhancement) David Woolley
• Re: Replaceable element for parameterising pages (was: Proposal for small enhancement) Andrei Eftimie
• Re: Replaceable element for parameterising pages (was: Proposal for small enhancement) Sorin Schwimmer
• Re: Replaceable element for parameterising pages (was: Proposal for small enhancement) David Woolley
• Re: Replaceable element for parameterising pages (was: Proposal for small enhancement) Sorin Schwimmer
• Re: Proposal for small enhancement Andrei Eftimie
• Replaceable element for parameterising pages (was: Proposal for small enhancement) David Woolley

Thursday, 4 December 2008

• Proposal for small enhancement Sorin Schwimmer

Friday, 5 December 2008

• "Syntax and semantics for embedding RDF in XHTML" TAG issue addressed by RDFa and GRDDL (RDFinHTML-35) Dan Connolly

Thursday, 4 December 2008

• Re[2]: [META] Design View #53 - Mobile Web 2.0: The New Fun Park For Developers? Shavkat Karimov
• Re: [META] Design View #53 - Mobile Web 2.0: The New Fun Park For Developers? David Dorward
• Re[2]: [META] Design View #53 - Mobile Web 2.0: The New Fun Park For Developers? Shavkat Karimov
• Re: [META] Design View #53 - Mobile Web 2.0: The New Fun Park For Developers? Stephen Stewart
• Re: [META] Design View #53 - Mobile Web 2.0: The New Fun Park For Developers? David Woolley
• Re: Design View #53 - Mobile Web 2.0: The New Fun Park For Developers? David Calhoun
• Re: Design View #53 - Mobile Web 2.0: The New Fun Park For Developers? Jens Meiert

Wednesday, 3 December 2008

• Design View #53 - Mobile Web 2.0: The New Fun Park For Developers? SitePoint

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 December 2008 23:22:07 UTC