- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:59:39 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > No, that's backwards. Nothing gets added or retained without some > evidence that it's needed. Otherwise, you could use that argument to > get us show why the <foo> element isn't needed, instead having the ones > who asked for it explain why it is. Which seems to me what's happening with refinements for <b>, <i>, <sup>, <sub> etc P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2007 09:59:51 UTC