W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Cleaning House

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:19:18 +0900
Message-Id: <7D7B4251-FA15-4D0D-A380-BAC919185A47@w3.org>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C HTML <www-html@w3.org>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>

Le 6 mai 2007 à 11:43, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
> Please consider the following two steps :

(very good authoring scenario given by Daniel)

>    <h2><i>bar</i>foo</h2>

> As a conclusion, I would say that <h2><i>foo</i></foo> is not only
> acceptable but MUST be accepted if you want to have wysiwyg editors.
> This is a mandatory compromise if you want to have editing tools
> average people are able to use. Otherwise, you'll have code purity
> and a software behaviour people don't understand.

* Do you think the way this kind of things are edited can be  
described normatively? (or impossible because too many cases.)

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 05:20:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 30 April 2020 16:21:03 UTC